| Men are indifferent. Poor Women. |
|
|
| Posted by Administrator | |
|
Screw up more women? No problem. The RH-bill protects the men!...A provocative insight by author, entrepreneur and Pinoy Pilgrim Manoling de Leon. Having fewer children is good for the economy. It is being a responsible parent, good for the mother’s health, best for the child, and humane. This gives the woman ample time and resources to “seek her new identity.” These arguments are the catchphrases of the contraceptive mentality, unmistakeable signs of the growing culture of death that the late (soon-to-be-saint) John Paul II warned us about. Unfortunately, in one of the most mind-numbing cases of intellectual blowjob ever, most women the world over swallowed these aberrations lock, stock and barrel. Just because these slivers of twisted logic were fed by the West, those among us who suffer from a subconscious colonial mentality -- legislators, women and men amply and sumptuously funded by pharmaceuticals and pro-choice NGOs, straights, gays and lesbians -- were convinced it was an offer they could not refuse. Using arguments that have succeeded in the rest of the world -- vehemently hysterical diatribes against religion and cultural history, economic arguments that contradict even the most basic laws of economics, and nightmare scenarios that go against reality -- these people with a gargantuan inferiority complex are pushing hard to get the Reproductive Health or RH Bill signed into law. In this fight of stupidity and money versus common sense and logic, stupidity and money is winning. Never mind if majority of Filipinos do not believe one bit in the RH Bill. If we don’t do anything, the RH Bill will pass. What can we do? We can support the Bill or oppose it. Either way, we win. Here’s how. Men of the Philippines: support the Bill! If more women use pills and can have abortions, this means we men can screw more of them. Great! Let the women think the Bill will do them good, when in reality it will be better for us men. If, as the Bill’s proponents say, many women already suffer without the RH Bill, think how many more would suffer with it. Look at what’s happening in the West. So, support the Bill I say. Or, we can oppose the Bill, at all cost. The only benefit I see from opposing the Bill is that more dollars will have to be spent by the pharmaceuticals and pro-choice NGOs to keep on running this Bill through Congress every time we have a change of government. This is good for the economy, good for employment, good for us. Poor women! They think the RH Bill will benefit them? It’s like firing a cannon to kill a fly. In their effort to protect the few who are abused by their good-for-nothing partners, those who push for the RH Bill will open the floodgates to something worse: the eradication of womanhood and the degradation of what John Paul II called the female genius. Society will suffer, sure, but we men will be better for it. Just look at the West, where the feminists failed to learn from the lessons of history and allowed the men to screw at will. In exchange for a false sense of reproductive security, women are suffering from social and economic insecurity. Do we want these for our women? I have two daughters and many more nieces and grand-daughters. I don’t want them to suffer the same fate as the other women in the developed world. My personal stand is: Oppose the Bill for all that it’s worth. At least, it’s good for the economy. Manoling de Leon Senior Citizen Republic of the Philippines |
|
| Last Updated ( Thursday, 22 October 2009 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|